The global tourism industry, a colossus of economic activity, continues to expand despite geopolitical and environmental headwinds. In 2024, international tourist arrivals reached 1.4 billion, surpassing pre-pandemic levels by 1%, with total export revenues from tourism hitting $2.0 trillion—an 11% increase in real terms over 2023. Projections for 2025 estimate 3% to 5% growth in arrivals, potentially exceeding 2 billion, driven by robust demand and aviation growth. The sector’s contribution to global GDP rose to $11.1 trillion in 2024, a 12.1% rise from the previous year. Yet tourism’s carbon footprint, growing 3.5% annually from 2009 to 2019, reached 8.8% of global greenhouse gas emissions, underscoring its environmental cost.
Ecotourism, a paradigm of sustainable travel, integrates environmental stewardship, cultural preservation, and equitable economic development. Its core dimensions—ecological conservation, community empowerment, cultural integrity, and sustainable economic returns—manifest variably across global contexts. When executed with rigour, ecotourism safeguards ecosystems and enriches local livelihoods; when mismanaged, it risks degradation and cultural commodification.
Incarcerated PTI Leaders call for nationwide dialogue to address political, economic crisis
Ecological conservation underpins ecotourism’s ethos. Costa Rica, harbouring 6% of global species, exemplifies this: ecotourism contributes $2.5 billion annually, sustaining reserves like Corcovado National Park. Elsewhere, vulnerabilities emerge: in Indonesia’s Komodo National Park, surging visitor numbers threaten endemic species, stressing the need for regulated access and low-impact practices. Community empowerment fosters local agency and economic inclusion. Botswana’s Okavango Community Trust generates $12 million annually, bolstering livelihoods while incentivising wildlife protection. Yet in Peru’s Amazon, external tour operators often marginalise indigenous groups, highlighting the need for participatory governance and equitable benefit-sharing.
Cultural integrity requires respectful engagement with indigenous heritage. Australia’s Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park, managed by Anangu custodians, channels tourism revenue to traditional owners while educating visitors. In contrast, mass tourism in Guatemala’s Maya regions reduces sacred rituals to spectacle, eroding authenticity. Sustainable economic returns ensure long-term viability without compromising ecological or cultural assets. Rwanda’s gorilla tourism generates $400 million, funding conservation and infrastructure. Yet overtourism on Nepal’s Annapurna Circuit strains resources, illustrating the need for carrying-capacity limits and reinvestment mechanisms.
Globally, ecotourism navigates the tension between growth and fidelity to its principles. Robust certification and localised governance models are critical to curbing greenwashing. Prioritising ecological limits, cultural authenticity, and equitable prosperity offers a framework for reconciling human mobility with preservation.
Gilgit-Baltistan acutely feels ecotourism’s promise and perils. Its glaciers, alpine meadows, and biodiversity hotspots are critical yet fragile. Glacial retreat threatens water security, while GLOFs expose climate vulnerability. Tourism, if mismanaged, exacerbates risks—foot traffic erodes soils, disrupts wildlife, and generates waste. A 2021 survey found 60% of Deosai National Park visitors left non-biodegradable litter, stressing the need for infrastructure and education. Similar issues plague K2, where tonnes of waste accumulate due to negligence.
Ecotourism, prioritising low-impact travel and community-led conservation, offers an alternative to extractive industries. CPEC’s infrastructure has enhanced accessibility, fuelling a surge in visitors: in 2024, Baltistan saw 486,571 domestic and 21,862 international tourists. This growth creates jobs for guides, homestay operators, and artisans. Yet CPEC’s environmental footprint—habitat fragmentation, emissions, and unregulated tourism—complicates sustainability.
Gilgit-Baltistan’s attractions are unparalleled. Manthokha Waterfall, Sarfaranga Cold Desert, Deosai’s wildflower plains, and Fairy Meadows enchant visitors, but all face environmental pressures. Climate vulnerability compounds challenges: in 2025, landslides closed the Karakoram Highway, stranding tourists and disrupting trade.
Switzerland’s Jungfrau-Aletsch region offers a model. Grindelwald curbed overtourism through visitor caps, zoning, and reinvesting revenues in conservation. Gilgit-Baltistan could adopt similar measures—limiting group sizes in Deosai, taxing high-impact activities, and prioritising community enterprises.
The region’s future hinges on disciplined governance: carrying capacities, waste management, and community training are essential. Tourism must fund conservation, not external conglomerates. The Tourism Department’s engagement with sustainable practices is encouraging, but scaling requires political will and global support for climate adaptation.
Gilgit-Baltistan’s landscapes and cultures are treasures. Preserving them demands balancing tourism, trade, and stewardship. Sustainability starts with all of us: individuals and policymakers alike must act to ensure tourism’s benefits reach the many, not the few—or risk inflicting a self-inflicted wound. Under the Tourism Department’s auspices, ecotourism can be a reality.
